Predicting the Constitutionality of Punitive Damages: A Statistical Approach

21 Pages Posted: 30 Jun 2009

See all articles by Edward K. Cheng

Edward K. Cheng

Vanderbilt Law School

Albert Yoon

University of Toronto Faculty of Law

Date Written: June 28, 2009

Abstract

The constitutional doctrine governing punitive damages captivates legal scholars and jurists in part because it is both complex and evolving. The unpredictability, however, presents difficulties for attorneys and their clients, who need greater certainty to make practical decisions about litigation and settlement. In this Essay, we offer a statistical approach for predicting court decisions on the constitutionality of punitives. As it turns out, basic logisitic regression methods with appropriate model selection can be quite effective, although we make further gains using a Bayesian hierarchical approach. Using a new dataset of cases challenging punitive damage constitutionality from 1989 to 2008, our hierarchical model can predict out-of-sample outcomes with 76-85 percent accuracy. These results suggest that while constitutionality may not be subject to a deterministic formula, it can be effectively modeled statistically. Beyond the punitive damages context, our work additionally offers a glimpse of the potential of statistical models for predicting a wide variety of legal questions.

Keywords: punitive damages, constitutionality, statistical prediction, prediction, forecasting, BMW v. Gore, model, punitives

Suggested Citation

Cheng, Edward K. and Yoon, Albert, Predicting the Constitutionality of Punitive Damages: A Statistical Approach (June 28, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1426892 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1426892

Edward K. Cheng (Contact Author)

Vanderbilt Law School ( email )

131 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37203-1181
United States
615-875-7630 (Phone)

Albert Yoon

University of Toronto Faculty of Law ( email )

78 and 84 Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5
Canada

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
101
Abstract Views
1,849
Rank
476,054
PlumX Metrics