Transnational Learning and Environmental Policy Advice: Theory Vs. Practice

32 Pages Posted: 1 Sep 2009

See all articles by Michael P. Howlett

Michael P. Howlett

Simon Fraser University

Sima Joshi-Koop

Simon Fraser University

Date Written: August 25, 2009

Abstract

In this paper, we seek to clarify further the processes of internationalization on environmental policy convergence by focussing narrowly on transnational communication as a mechanism for policy learning mediated by a country’s policy analytical capacity. We argue that without significant policy analytical capacity, it is unlikely for transnational communication as a source of lesson drawing to translate into environmental policy convergence. Based on a survey of Canadian provincial public servants, we find that policy analysts in the environmental policy sector do not engage in significant interaction or training outside of their own jurisdictions and are therefore unlikely to engage in extensive trans-national or international learning. This paper clarifies an important finding of Holzinger, Knill and Sommerer (2008) that while transnational communication leads to harmonization in the presence of policy, it does not result in convergence around particular policy instruments or their settings.

Keywords: transnational learning, environmental policy

Suggested Citation

Howlett, Michael and Joshi-Koop, Sima, Transnational Learning and Environmental Policy Advice: Theory Vs. Practice (August 25, 2009). Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy Research Paper No. LKYSPP09-008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1464667 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1464667

Michael Howlett (Contact Author)

Simon Fraser University ( email )

Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6
Canada

Sima Joshi-Koop

Simon Fraser University ( email )

8888 University Drive
Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6
Canada

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
98
Abstract Views
819
Rank
489,408
PlumX Metrics