Humanitarian Military Intervention: The Conditions for Success and Failure

Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007

29 Pages Posted: 14 Oct 2009 Last revised: 19 Oct 2009

Date Written: 2007

Abstract

Military intervention without a reasonable prospect of success is unjustifiable, especially when it is done in the name of humanity. Couched in the debate on the responsibility to protect civilians from violence and drawing on traditional ‘just war’ principles, the central premise of this book is that humanitarian military intervention can be justified as a policy option only if decision makers can be reasonably sure that intervention will do more good than harm. The book asks, ‘Have past humanitarian military interventions been successful?’. It defines success as saving lives and sets out a methodology for estimating the number of lives saved by a particular military intervention. Analysis of 17 military operations in six conflict areas that were the defining cases of the 1990s — northern Iraq after the Gulf War, Somalia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Rwanda, Kosovo and East Timor — shows that past interventions helped to save lives more often than not. In every conflict studied, however, some military interventions succeeded while others failed, raising the question, ‘Why have some past interventions been more successful than others?’ The book argues the central factors determining whether a humanitarian intervention succeeds are the objectives of the intervention and the military strategy employed by the intervening states. Four types of humanitarian military intervention are offered: providing logistical assistance, protecting aid operations, protecting the population and defeating the perpetrators of violence. The focus on strategy within these four types allows an exploration of the political and military dimensions of humanitarian intervention and highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each of the four types. Humanitarian military intervention is controversial. Scepticism is always in order about the need to use military force because the consequences can be so dire. Yet it has become equally controversial for a government to subject its citizens to massive violation of their basic human rights. This book recognizes the limits of humanitarian intervention but does not shy away from suggesting how use military force to save lives in extreme circumstances.

Keywords: humanitarian, intervention, military, strategy, civilian, protection, aid, Iraq, Somalia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Rwanda, East Timor, UN

Suggested Citation

Seybolt, Taylor B., Humanitarian Military Intervention: The Conditions for Success and Failure (2007). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1487382

Taylor B. Seybolt (Contact Author)

University of Pittsburgh ( email )

135 N Bellefield Ave
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,650
Abstract Views
5,952
Rank
20,144
PlumX Metrics