Lost Laws: What We Can’t Find in the United States Code

37 Pages Posted: 14 Oct 2010

See all articles by Will Tress

Will Tress

University of Baltimore - School of Law

Date Written: March 1, 2010

Abstract

The United States Code is the official and essential source for federal statutory law research. For many researchers it is the only place they look. On close examination, however, the Code has shortcomings: problems with drafting relegate some laws to notes and appendices; other valid and current laws are considered temporary and are left out of the Code entirely; the authority of the language in the Code varies from Title to Title, depending on whether a Title has been specially enacted into “positive law.” “Lost Laws: What We Can’t Find in the United States Code” traces the development of this complex, multi-layered document, and looks at its problematic structure and restricted content in the context of that history. The article proposes steps to resolve some of the difficulties with the current Code, and to begin building a new electronic version of the Code that meets popular expectations and the needs of researchers.

Keywords: U.S. Code, Statutes at Large, Legislation, Positive Law, Codification, Legal Research, Electronic Databases

Suggested Citation

Tress, Will, Lost Laws: What We Can’t Find in the United States Code (March 1, 2010). Golden Gate University Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 129-164, Winter 2010, University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, No. 2010-14, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1615451

Will Tress (Contact Author)

University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )

1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
412
Abstract Views
2,396
Rank
130,756
PlumX Metrics