Can a Theory of Interpretation Make a Difference?

Graven Images, Vol. 5, p. 15, 2002

5 Pages Posted: 16 Jun 2010

See all articles by George H. Taylor

George H. Taylor

University of Pittsburgh - School of Law

Date Written: 2002

Abstract

Can a theory of interpretation make a difference? The question has been posed most prominently by Judge Richard Posner, who, in recent work, has criticized the ability to make a difference of both theory writ large and of a theory of interpretation in particular. In other work I contend, contrary to Posner, that a theory of interpretation can make a difference at the level of methodology. Using the example of constitutional and statutory interpretation in law, I develop a theory that argues for the propriety and value of certain methods of interpretation over others. In the present essay, my concern is more expansive, if the development is more brief. My claim is that a theory of interpretation can make a difference at an ontological level, at the level of what it means for humans to be.

Keywords: hermeneutics, theory of interpretation, legal interpretation, understanding, metaphor, Paul Ricoeur, nonfoundationalism

Suggested Citation

Taylor, George H., Can a Theory of Interpretation Make a Difference? (2002). Graven Images, Vol. 5, p. 15, 2002, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1624827

George H. Taylor (Contact Author)

University of Pittsburgh - School of Law ( email )

3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
87
Abstract Views
542
Rank
523,966
PlumX Metrics