What's in a Name? Lloyd'S, Public Policy and International Comity

Canadian Business Law Journal, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2002

31 Pages Posted: 2 Oct 2002 Last revised: 8 Jul 2010

See all articles by Genevieve Saumier

Genevieve Saumier

McGill University - Faculty of Law

Date Written: July 8, 2010

Abstract

The Lloyd's litigation saga has met the same end in Canada as it has in most American jurisdictions. English judgments against foreign investors ("Names") have been recognized in the defendants' home jurisdiction despite challenges based on public policy.

Using the latest Ontario case as a starting point, the author examines the public policy arguments surrounding the litigation, from the original enforcement of contractual choice-of-jurisdiction clauses to the final decision to enforce the resulting foreign judgment. The author questions the usefulness of a public policy analysis at the initial jurisdictional stage. She argues that an approach based on the concept of mandatory rules (also known as "lois d'application immediate" or "lois de police") is preferable as it allows for a more coherent examination of the legislative and judicial policies at stake.

The argument for recognition based on international comity is then considered. The author argues that precedence granted to party autonomy and international comity is difficult to reconcile with the Ontario court's findings on the fundamental nature of its securities regulation. The author concludes that the Canadian court may have been overly concerned not to deviate from the path set by American courts, thereby subordinating domestic policy to the perceived imperatives of international comity.

Keywords: Foreign judgments, public policy, international comity, securities law

JEL Classification: K22, K33, K40

Suggested Citation

Saumier, Genevieve, What's in a Name? Lloyd'S, Public Policy and International Comity (July 8, 2010). Canadian Business Law Journal, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2002, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=330240

Genevieve Saumier (Contact Author)

McGill University - Faculty of Law ( email )

3644 Peel Street
Montreal H3A 1W9, Quebec H3A 1W9
Canada
514-398-6637 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
88
Abstract Views
955
Rank
520,585
PlumX Metrics