Do the European Union’s Bilateral Investment Treaties Matter?
CEPS Working Document No. 333, July 2010
15 Pages Posted: 29 Jul 2010
Date Written: July 26, 2010
Abstract
This working paper addresses a number of policy-relevant issues regarding the EU’s bilateral investment treaties (BITS), namely, whether the EU’s BITs have a significantly positive impact on outflows; and which member states and which BIT partners have had a significant experience after the implementation of the BIT. The author finds that both OECD BITs and EU BITs have a statistically significant and positive impact on FDI outflows. This result is robust to the inclusion of variables such as privatisation proceeds that control for the level of economic reform, the level of trade linkages, the level of democratic freedom and a measure of risk of expropriation among other standard controls. A number of policy implications of these findings are also considered.
Keywords: Investment Treaties, BITS, Outflows, FDI, EU BIT, Economic Reform
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960-2000
By Zachary Elkins, Andrew T. Guzman, ...
-
Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960-2000
By Beth A. Simmons, Zachary Elkins, ...
-
Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960-2000
By Beth A. Simmons, Andrew T. Guzman, ...
-
Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Increase Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries?
By Eric Neumayer and Laura Spess
-
Do Double Taxation Treaties Increase Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries?
-
On Waves, Clusters, and Diffusion: A Conceptual Framework
By Beth A. Simmons and Zachary Elkins