Innocent Frauds Meet Goodhart’s Law in Monetary Policy
Levy Economics Institute of Bard College Working Paper No. 622
23 Pages Posted: 5 Oct 2010
Date Written: September 5, 2010
Abstract
This paper discusses recent UK monetary policies as instances of John Kenneth Galbraith’s “innocent fraud,” including the idea that money is a thing rather than a relationship, the fallacy of composition (i.e., that what is possible for one bank is possible for all banks), and the belief that the money supply can be controlled by reserves management. The origins of the idea of quantitative easing (QE), and its defense when it was applied in Britain, are analyzed through this lens. An empirical analysis of the effect of reserves on lending is conducted; we do not find evidence that QE “worked,” either by a direct effect on money spending, or through an equity market effect. These findings are placed in a historical context in a comparison with earlier money control experiments in the UK.
Keywords: Quantitative Easing, UK Innocent Frauds, Accounting
JEL Classification: E52, E58
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Monetary Policy Alternatives at the Zero Bound: An Empirical Assessment
By Ben S. Bernanke, Vincent R. Reinhart, ...
-
The Zero Bound in an Open Economy: A Foolproof Way of Escaping from a Liquidity Trap
-
Theoretical Analysis Regarding a Zero Lower Bound on Nominal Interest Rates
-
Real Implications of the Zero Bound on Nominal Interest Rates
-
By Jess Benhabib, Stephanie Schmitt-grohé, ...
-
By Jess Benhabib, Stephanie Schmitt-grohé, ...
-
Escaping from a Liquidity Trap and Deflation: The Foolproof Way and Others
-
Monetary Policy When the Nominal Short-Term Interest Rate is Zero
By James A. Clouse, Dale W. Henderson, ...