Involuntary Mental Health Treatment Laws: The ‘Rights’ and the Wrongs of Competing Models?
RETHINKING RIGHTS-BASKED MENTAL HEALTH LAWS, pp. 257-274, B. McSherry, P. Weller, eds., Hart Publishing, 2010
27 Pages Posted: 8 Oct 2010
Date Written: October 6, 2010
Abstract
This Chapter argues for retention, in renovated form, of a ‘rights’ model of mental health legislation, built around re-structured mental health review hearings providing not only protections for ‘civil’ rights through prompt and full interdisciplinary review of the basis for involuntary detention, but also fully engaging the medical (treatment) and social (functional) aspects of involuntary mental health care. It is argued that these wider responsibilities of mental health tribunals are a key constituent of plans for advancing socio-economic as well as the traditional civil rights of mentally ill people at various levels of interaction with government or civil society. This expanded range of functions will advance both the right to health, and assist in realising the right to social participation (or ‘social citizenship’).
Keywords: mental health, involuntary treatment, community treatment orders, human rights, reform
JEL Classification: K10, K30, K32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Pushing the Boundaries: Realising Rights Through Mental Health Tribunal Processes?
By Terry Carney Ao, David Tait, ...
-
Access to Justice for Discrimination Complainants: Courts and Legal Representation
By Beth Gaze and Rosemary Hunter
-
The Future of Welfare Law in a Changing World: Lessons from Australia and Singapore?
-
The Future of Welfare Law in a Changing World: Lessons from Australia and Singapore
-
Creation of a Disability Rights Tribunal for Asia and the Pacific: Its Impact on China?
-
Mental Health Tribunals as Governance: Lessons from an Australian Study?
-
A Regional Disability Tribunal for Asia and the Pacific: Helping to Change the Conversation?