Download This PaperArbitrator Appointments in Investment Arbitration: Why Expressed Views on Points of Law Should Be Challengeable
Investment Treaty News Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 13, September 2010
8 Pages Posted: 19 Oct 2010 Last revised: 21 Oct 2010
Date Written: September 18, 2010
Abstract
This paper argues that contrary to contemporary practice, it should be possible to prevent an arbitrator being appointed to a tribunal because he/she has expressed opinions on general principles of law that will have a central role in the arbitration, even where no judgement has been made regarding the application of those laws to the case at hand.
Keywords: International Investment Arbitration
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Cole, Tony, Arbitrator Appointments in Investment Arbitration: Why Expressed Views on Points of Law Should Be Challengeable (September 18, 2010). Investment Treaty News Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 13, September 2010, Warwick School of Law Research Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1693888
Tony Cole (Contact Author)
University of Leicester Law School ( email )
University Road
Leicester LE1 7RH, LE1 7RH
United Kingdom
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.