Combining Historical Cost and Fair Value

44 Pages Posted: 22 Oct 2010

See all articles by Haijin Lin

Haijin Lin

University of Houston

Tong Lu

University of Houston

Date Written: October 20, 2010

Abstract

This study is to examine the economic consequences of asset measurement bases for illiquid, productive assets. We explicitly model both the entrepreneur (the seller) and the investor (the buyer) investment decision in a setting where the entrepreneur’s hidden action (investment decision) and hidden information (future prospects of the asset) are communicated through accounting reports. We derive three main …findings. (i) Historical cost rule dominates fair value rule (in terms of securing greater social surplus) if and only if the expected prospects of the asset are sufficiently good. (ii) The lower of cost or fair value rule is welfare improving relative to the two pure measurement bases. (iii) Under the lower of cost or fair value rule, a large amortization rate induces a lower level of investment. However, such interplay between accounting and real decisions varies with the prevailing asset measurement basis.

Keywords: asset measurement, historical cost, fair value, lower of cost or fair value

JEL Classification: D53, D60, D82

Suggested Citation

Lin, Haijin and Lu, Tong, Combining Historical Cost and Fair Value (October 20, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1695216 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1695216

Haijin Lin

University of Houston ( email )

390F Melcher Hall
Bauer College of Business
Houston, TX 77204-6021
United States
7137437771 (Phone)

Tong Lu (Contact Author)

University of Houston ( email )

4800 Calhoun Road
Houston, TX 77204
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
597
Abstract Views
3,106
Rank
84,041
PlumX Metrics