Combining Historical Cost and Fair Value
44 Pages Posted: 22 Oct 2010
Date Written: October 20, 2010
Abstract
This study is to examine the economic consequences of asset measurement bases for illiquid, productive assets. We explicitly model both the entrepreneur (the seller) and the investor (the buyer) investment decision in a setting where the entrepreneur’s hidden action (investment decision) and hidden information (future prospects of the asset) are communicated through accounting reports. We derive three main findings. (i) Historical cost rule dominates fair value rule (in terms of securing greater social surplus) if and only if the expected prospects of the asset are sufficiently good. (ii) The lower of cost or fair value rule is welfare improving relative to the two pure measurement bases. (iii) Under the lower of cost or fair value rule, a large amortization rate induces a lower level of investment. However, such interplay between accounting and real decisions varies with the prevailing asset measurement basis.
Keywords: asset measurement, historical cost, fair value, lower of cost or fair value
JEL Classification: D53, D60, D82
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Marking to Market: Panacea or Pandora's Box?
By Guillaume Plantin, Haresh Sapra, ...
-
Mark-to-Market Accounting and Liquidity Pricing
By Franklin Allen and Elena Carletti
-
The Crisis of Fair Value Accounting: Making Sense of the Recent Debate
By Christian Laux and Christian Leuz
-
Did Fair-Value Accounting Contribute to the Financial Crisis?
By Christian Laux and Christian Leuz
-
Did Fair-Value Accounting Contribute to the Financial Crisis?
By Christian Laux and Christian Leuz
-
By Weitzu Chen, Chi-chun Liu, ...
-
By Chang Joon Song, Wayne B. Thomas, ...
-
Fair Value Accounting and Financial Stability
By Andrea Enria, Lorenzo Cappiello, ...
-
Do Investors Perceive Marking-to-Model as Marking-to-Myth? Early Evidence from FAS 157 Disclosure