The Inefficiency of Clearing Mandates
40 Pages Posted: 19 Nov 2010
Date Written: July 21, 2010
Abstract
In the aftermath of the financial crisis, attention has turned to reducing systemic risk in the derivatives markets. Much of this attention has focused on counterparty risk in the over-the-counter market, where trades are bilaterally executed between dealers and derivative purchasers. One proposal for addressing such counterparty risk is to mandate the trading of derivatives over a centralized clearinghouse. This paper lays out the advantages and risks to a mandated clearing requirement, showing how, in some instances, such a mandate can actually increase systemic risk and result in more financial bailouts.
This paper also describes the dynamics of counterparty risk in the derivatives market. Discussing the relative importance of both the risk that arises from the price risk of the instrument at issue and the financial condition of the counterparty. The analysis then turns to an evaluation of how bilateral markets and clearinghouses manage these two risks. After demonstrating that resolving and replacing defaulted trades is the primary resolution problem facing both market structures, the paper lays out an auction alternative designed to address this issue.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
A Theory of Systemic Risk and Design of Prudential Bank Regulation
-
A Theory of Systemic Risk and Design of Prudential Bank Regulation
-
A Theory of Systemic Risk and Design of Prudential Bank Regulation
-
By Viral V. Acharya, Lasse Heje Pedersen, ...
-
By Viral V. Acharya, Lasse Heje Pedersen, ...
-
By Viral V. Acharya, Lasse Heje Pedersen, ...
-
Too Many to Fail - An Analysis of Time-Inconsistency in Bank Closure Policies
By Viral V. Acharya and Tanju Yorulmazer
-
Too Many to Fail - an Analysis of Time Inconsistency in Bank Closure Policies
By Viral V. Acharya and Tanju Yorulmazer