Sixty Years to the Law of Return: History, Ideology, Justification (in Hebrew)

Metzila, 2010

128 Pages Posted: 18 Jun 2011 Last revised: 31 Mar 2016

See all articles by Ruth E. Gavison

Ruth E. Gavison

Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Faculty of Law

Date Written: January 1, 2009

Abstract

עלייה יהודית וקיבוץ גלויות היו שתיים מן המטרות העיקריות של המפעל הציוני ושל מדינת ישראל. חוק השבות התש"י-1950 היה הכלי המדיני והמשפטי שבאמצעותו ביקשה מדינת ישראל לממש אידאלים אלה. החוק נתפס בעיני רבים כאחד הביטויים העיקריים ליהדותה של המדינה. חוק השבות משמש מוקד בולט לחילוקי דעות הן בעניין ההצדקה של העדפת יהודים בהגירה לישראל, הן בעניין הפנים-יהודי העוסק במהות הקולקטיב היהודי ובדרכים לזיהוי החברים בו והמצטרפים אליו. נייר עמדה זה מבקש לדון בנושאים אלה

The Law of Return, passed unanimously by the Knesset with much excitement and elation in 1950 on the day commemorating Theodor Herzl, establishes the principle that "every Jew is entitled to come to this country as an Oleh" and lays the foundation for the preference given to Jews in Aliyah and in the acquisition of citizenship in Israel. The law is considered one of the primary expressions of Israel as a Jewish state. In this position paper the author rejects the principal claim of the law's opponents, that the preference given to Jews in Aliyah to Israel is either unjustified or needs to be limited in time. The author surveys the development of the specific arrangements stipulated by the Law of Return. She points to difficulties arising in three basic areas: the quasi-halachic definition of a "Jew" established by the 1970 amendment to law, according to which a "Jew" is one who was born to a Jewish mother or who converted to Judaism and is not a member of another religion; the extension of Aliyah eligibility to include the family members of a Jew up to the third generation even if they themselves have no connection to the Jewish people; the fact that individuals who are eligible for Aliyah acquire citizenship immediately and automatically upon making Aliyah. The author recommends preserving the principle and even raising it to a constitutional level, while re-examining the specific arrangements included in the Law of Return and the level of their regulation. As long as there is no such constitutional change the author does not support any alteration in the Law of Return itself, but rather recommends achieving the desired results through forming appropriate Aliyah and absorption policies.

Note: Downloadable document is in Hebrew.

Suggested Citation

Gavison, Ruth E., Sixty Years to the Law of Return: History, Ideology, Justification (in Hebrew) (January 1, 2009). Metzila, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1723647

Ruth E. Gavison (Contact Author)

Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Faculty of Law ( email )

Mount Scopus
Mount Scopus, IL 91905
Israel

HOME PAGE: http://www.gavison.com

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
89
Abstract Views
619
Rank
516,898
PlumX Metrics