Prosecution or Impunity? Is There an Alternative?

10 Pages Posted: 27 Jan 2011 Last revised: 29 Jan 2011

See all articles by Marco Fanara

Marco Fanara

United Nations Mandated University for Peace

Date Written: January 27, 2011

Abstract

International law stipulates states have a duty to prosecute individuals alleged to have committed or were in some way involved in gross violations of human rights. States also have the option of granting impunity to those individuals as a precondition to peace. Herein predicaments abound, do states seek ‘justice’ and prosecute or grant impunity in the name of ‘reconciliation’. Are there alternatives? This paper presents arguments for and against both camps. To do so the case study of Uganda and the ICC’s involvement therein is utilized. In short this paper aims to answer the question of whether impunity acts as a barrier to lasting peace or is it a crucial prerequisite.

Keywords: Impunity, International Law, Human Rights

Suggested Citation

Fanara, Marco, Prosecution or Impunity? Is There an Alternative? (January 27, 2011). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1749658 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1749658

Marco Fanara (Contact Author)

United Nations Mandated University for Peace ( email )

El Rodeo, Ciudad Colon
San Jose
Costa Rica

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
113
Abstract Views
645
Rank
442,582
PlumX Metrics