Data, Field Work, and Extracting New Ideas at Close Range
Newsletter of the Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Association, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1999
5 Pages Posted: 21 Feb 2011
Date Written: 1999
Abstract
Good research in comparative politics depends on the collection and availability of many different forms of data, and also on diverse approaches to data analysis. Attention must be given to collecting and archiving of quantitative data sets; to the role of intensive field research; and to the opportunities for publishing studies based on rich qualitative data. Although organizing research by moving from theory to data is a fundamental component of the comparative politics enterprise, inductive, case-study research driven by a process of “extracting new ideas at close range” likewise makes a major contribution, and it is essential to the intellectual breadth of comparative politics.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy. Evaluating Alternative Indices
By Gerardo L. Munck and Jay Verkuilen
-
Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research
By Robert Adcock and David Collier
-
A Global Model for Forecasting Political Instability
By Jack A. Goldstone, Robert Bates, ...
-
Two Persistent Dimensions of Democracy: Contestation and Inclusiveness
By Michael Coppedge, Angel Alvarez, ...
-
Giving Order to Districts: Estimating Voter Distributions with National Election Returns
-
Varieties of Democracy Project Description
By Michael Coppedge, John Gerring, ...
-
Elections and Political Instability: Ballots to Bullets, Voting to Violence?
-
The Limits to Bureaucratic Observation: On the Role of Judgment in Comparative Political Measurement