Voluntary Cleanup Programs and Redevelopment Potential: Lessons from Baltimore, Maryland
30 Pages Posted: 15 Feb 2011
Date Written: December 1, 2010
Abstract
In the United States, policy has increasingly shifted toward economic incentives and liability attenuation for promoting cleanup and redevelopment of contaminated sites, but little is known about the effectiveness of such policies. These policies include, among others, state Voluntary Cleanup Programs (VCPs), which were established in the United States in the 1990s and, to date, have been implemented in nearly every state. This article focuses on 116 Baltimore properties that were enrolled and participated in the Maryland VCP from its inception in 1997 to the end of 2006 and examines what type of properties tend to participate in these programs, how these properties compare with other eligible but nonparticipating sites, and what the redevelopment potential of VCP properties and implications is toward open-space conversion.
We find that most applicants (66 percent) actually requested a No Further Requirements Determination directly, rather than proposing cleanup. Nevertheless, the VCP led to the identification and environmental assessment of 1,175 acres of contaminated land in the city of Baltimore alone. In Baltimore, VCP properties tend to be industrial, located in areas zoned as industrial, and away from residential neighborhoods. In more recent years, larger properties have increasingly enrolled in the program. Most participating sites are reused as industrial or commercial properties. In contrast with Alberini (2007), these findings suggest that, in Baltimore, pressure for residential development has not driven VCP participation to date. Based on differences in zoning requirements, the VCP may reduce demand for potentially contaminating activities on pristine land by as much as 1,238 to 6,444 acres, in Baltimore alone.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Effects of Disease Type and Latency on the Value of Mortality Risk
By Jin‐tan Liu and James K. Hammitt
-
Are Poor People Worth Less than Rich People? Disaggregating the Value of Statistical Lives
-
By Anna Alberini and Aline Chiabai
-
Paying for Permanence: Public Preferences for Contaminated Site Cleanup
By Anna Alberini, Stefania Tonin, ...
-
Willingness to Pay for Mortality Risk Reductions: Does Latency Matter?
By Anna Alberini, Maureen Cropper, ...
-
Discount Rates in Risk V. Money and Money V. Money Tradeoffs
By Anna Alberini and Aline Chiabai
-
By Anna Alberini, Anil Markandya, ...
-
By Anna Alberini, Stefania Tonin, ...