Just Laws Versus Unjust Laws: Asserting the Morality of Civil Disobedience

Journal of Politics and Law, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 156-170, 2010

14 Pages Posted: 28 Feb 2011

See all articles by George Forji Amin

George Forji Amin

School of Law - University of Bolton; University of Helsinki - Faculty of Law; School of Law, The University of Manchester

Date Written: February 25, 2011

Abstract

How is a citizen living under a merciless totalitarianism such as the Nazi but opposed to its philosophies expected to respond to the law? Where does his primary obligation as a citizen reside? Is it to the laws of the land that command total submission or to his convictions by which he is convinced that the system is totally unjust? Does one have a moral obligation to always obey the law? Conversely, should one obey an unjust law? Obviously, such an individual like Antigone in ancient Greece is naturally torn between two loyalties. If he obeys the law, he would be guilty of knowingly aiding to sustain an unjust system. If he follows his moral judgment and violate the law, he would be charged with the penalty stipulated in the law.

Keywords: Just laws, unjust laws, civil disobedience, Martin Luther King Jr, Malcolm X, Thoreau, Ghandi, Antigone

Suggested Citation

Forji Amin, George, Just Laws Versus Unjust Laws: Asserting the Morality of Civil Disobedience (February 25, 2011). Journal of Politics and Law, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 156-170, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1769945

George Forji Amin (Contact Author)

School of Law - University of Bolton ( email )

Deane Road
Bolton, BL3 5AB
United Kingdom

University of Helsinki - Faculty of Law ( email )

Porthania
P.O. Box 4
Helsinki, FIN-0001 4
Finland

School of Law, The University of Manchester ( email )

Booth St West
Manchester, N/A M15 6PB
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
483
Abstract Views
2,468
Rank
109,387
PlumX Metrics