Naval Chameleons: Re-Evaluating the Legality of Deceptive Lighting Under International Humanitarian Law

Canadian Naval Review, Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 4, 2011

6 Pages Posted: 28 Feb 2011

See all articles by Mike Madden

Mike Madden

University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law

Date Written: February 28, 2011

Abstract

A warship, like a chameleon, can gain a tactical advantage at sea by changing its appearance, and particularly by employing deceptive lighting measures at night. International Humanitarian Law (IHL), however, only permits certain forms of trickery or “ruses” in armed conflicts, while prohibiting more treacherous forms of “perfidy.” In spite of a widespread acceptance of deceptive lighting within naval circles, and a blanket condemnation of the practice from certain academic commentators, this article will demonstrate that deceptive lighting is neither universally permitted nor prohibited under IHL. Naval commanders may require a more nuanced understanding of IHL’s perfidy laws if they are to properly assess the legality of deceptive lighting.

Keywords: Perfidy, Deceptive Lighting, IHL, Ruse, Naval Warfare

Suggested Citation

Madden, Mike, Naval Chameleons: Re-Evaluating the Legality of Deceptive Lighting Under International Humanitarian Law (February 28, 2011). Canadian Naval Review, Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 4, 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1773099

Mike Madden (Contact Author)

University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law ( email )

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
481
Abstract Views
1,768
Rank
109,242
PlumX Metrics