Misplacing NEMA? A Consideration of Some Problematic Aspects of South Africa's New EIA Regulations

42 Pages Posted: 30 Mar 2011

See all articles by Jeremy Ridl

Jeremy Ridl

Attorney, Environmental Law Specialist

Ed Couzens

University of KwaZulu-Natal - Faculty of Law (Howard College and Pietermaritzburg Campuses)

Date Written: December 30, 2010

Abstract

In mid-2006, new Regulations governing environmental impact assessment were published in terms of the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998. It is argued in this article that the old Regulations under the Environment Conservation Act 73 of 1989, which were replaced, had proved inadequate not because of any inherent deficiency, but because they were never properly implemented and because they were instead subjected to much inaccurate criticism. The article then canvasses the old Regulations and considers criticisms thereof, before canvassing the new Regulations and assessing differences between the old and the new. Various specific concerns and potential shortcomings are raised and considered; and various interpretations are offered of problematic provisions. A prognosis for the success and/or failure of the new Regulations is then put forward in the context of the South African government's present approach to economic growth, environmental protection and the enforcement of environmental legislation. Finally, it is argued that there are danger signs that the new Regulations will be as misunderstood and misapplied as were the old Regulations and that the fundamental principles of the National Environmental Management Act are likely not to be adhered to in the implementation of the new Regulations

Keywords: Assessment, authorisation, environment, Environmental Impact Assessment, Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs, National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998, Environment Conservation Act 73 of 1989, procedure, environmental impact

Suggested Citation

Ridl, Jeremy and Couzens, Ed, Misplacing NEMA? A Consideration of Some Problematic Aspects of South Africa's New EIA Regulations (December 30, 2010). Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol. 13, No. 5, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1795088

Jeremy Ridl (Contact Author)

Attorney, Environmental Law Specialist ( email )

Ed Couzens

University of KwaZulu-Natal - Faculty of Law (Howard College and Pietermaritzburg Campuses) ( email )

Durban 4041
South Africa

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
65
Abstract Views
480
Rank
618,039
PlumX Metrics