When Regulators Mean Business: Regulation in the Shadow of Environmental Armageddon

Rechtsfilosofie & Rechtstheorie, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 47-57, 2011

10 Pages Posted: 22 Apr 2011 Last revised: 13 May 2015

Date Written: April 6, 2011

Abstract

In this article, I argue that impending ecological catastrophe invites regulators a) to focus on regulatory effectiveness, and b) to afford little significance to the legitimacy of regulatory action designed to avert such a catastrophe. This implies that regulators will resort to 'techno-regulation' or 'code,' leaving regulatees no option but to comply with the rules. In addition, regulators must adopt a much more sympathetic attitude towards new 'high risk technologies.' In effect, against the background of impending catastrophe, the precautionary principle will instruct that scientific uncertainty about the risks of new technologies, such as geoengineering or synthetic biology, is no reason not to give those technologies the green light.

Keywords: Regulation, geoengineering, code, environmental law, new technologies, catastrophe

Suggested Citation

Somsen, Han, When Regulators Mean Business: Regulation in the Shadow of Environmental Armageddon (April 6, 2011). Rechtsfilosofie & Rechtstheorie, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 47-57, 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1804114

Han Somsen (Contact Author)

Tilburg Law School ( email )

Tilburg, 5000 LE
Netherlands

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
145
Abstract Views
609
Rank
365,750
PlumX Metrics