Against Public Interest Standing in Administrative Law: Exploring a Non-Individualist Constitutional Argument

20 Pages Posted: 1 Jul 2011

See all articles by Hanna Wilberg

Hanna Wilberg

University of Auckland - Faculty of Law

Date Written: June 11, 2007

Abstract

This paper considers public interest standing from one particular angle, namely the proper constitutional role of courts. Should public interest standing be opposed on the basis that it entails a constitutionally inappropriate political role for courts, or should it be supported on the basis that it is necessary for allowing the courts to discharge their constitutional law enforcement functions?

Opposition to public interest standing on the basis that it entails a constitutionally inappropriate political role for courts tends to be associated with a narrow individualistic view of the role of courts in public law as protecting individual interests against unlawful government interference. That view is rejected by many, perhaps most, judges and commentators today, in favour of a broader view of the role of courts in public law as holding the government to account to the extent of enforcing legal limits and standards. The main argument in this paper is that those are not the only two positions available, because there is an alternative progressive basis for opposing public interest standing.

Keywords: Standing, Locus Standi, Administrative Law

Suggested Citation

Wilberg, Hanna, Against Public Interest Standing in Administrative Law: Exploring a Non-Individualist Constitutional Argument (June 11, 2007). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1875065 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1875065

Hanna Wilberg (Contact Author)

University of Auckland - Faculty of Law ( email )

Private Bag 92019
Auckland Mail Centre
Auckland, 1142
New Zealand

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
220
Abstract Views
1,003
Rank
251,629
PlumX Metrics