The Rise, Fall and Revival of the Swedish Welfare State: What are the Policy Lessons from Sweden?

29 Pages Posted: 14 Jul 2011 Last revised: 28 Apr 2012

See all articles by Andreas Bergh

Andreas Bergh

Lund University - Department of Economics; Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN)

Date Written: July 12, 2011

Abstract

This paper discusses a number of questions with regard to Sweden’s economic and political development: How did Sweden become rich? What explains Sweden’s high level of income equality? What were the causes of Sweden’s problems from 1970 to 1995? How is it possible that Sweden, since the crisis of the early 1990s, is growing faster than most EU countries despite its high taxes and generous welfare state? These questions are analyzed using recent insights from institutional economics, as well as studies of inequality and economic growth. The main conclusion is that there is little, if any, Swedish exceptionalism: Sweden became rich because of well-functioning capitalist institutions, and inequality was low before the expansion of the welfare state. The recent favorable growth record of Sweden, including the period of financial stress (2008-2010), is a likely outcome of a number of far-reaching structural reforms implemented in the 1980s and 90s.

Keywords: Sweden, Welfare State, Equality, Growth, Institutions, Capitalism

JEL Classification: H50, I38, O43, O52

Suggested Citation

Bergh, Andreas and Bergh, Andreas, The Rise, Fall and Revival of the Swedish Welfare State: What are the Policy Lessons from Sweden? (July 12, 2011). IFN Working Paper No. 873, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1884528 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1884528

Andreas Bergh (Contact Author)

Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN) ( email )

Box 55665
Grevgatan 34 2nd floor
Stockholm, SE-102 15
Sweden
0707790734 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.ifn.se/web/AndreasB

Lund University - Department of Economics ( email )

P.O. Box 7082
S-220 07
Lund
Sweden

HOME PAGE: http://www.nek.lu.se/

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
813
Abstract Views
4,445
Rank
56,461
PlumX Metrics