Does U.S. Military Intervention Reduce or Increase Terrorism?
41 Pages Posted: 1 Aug 2011 Last revised: 9 Aug 2011
Date Written: 2011
Abstract
Whether U.S. military intervention causes retaliatory terrorist attacks is a contentious issue. This study first conceptualizes the U.S. military intervention-terrorism connection, and then performs empirical tests. A cross-national, time-series analysis of 166 countries during the period from 1970 to 2005 shows that the overall effect of U.S. military intervention on terrorism is detrimental, fueling more terrorist incidents if not more terrorist casualties. However, this finding varies depending on the type of intervention mission. Terrorist pursuit interventions successfully deter terrorism, but other intervention missions, such as those that neutralize domestic disputes, facilitate regime change, and offer humanitarian aid, backfire. These findings indicate that the U.S. should be more cautious of the use of the military since it inflames terrorism except for those instances in which combating terrorism is set as a central goal.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Calculating Tragedy: Assessing the Costs of Terrorism
By Bruno S. Frey, Simon Luechinger, ...
-
Does Terror Threaten Human Rights? Evidence from Panel Data
By Axel Dreher, Martin Gassebner, ...
-
Does Terror Threaten Human Rights? Evidence from Panel Data
By Axel Dreher, Martin Gassebner, ...
-
September 11 and Time-Varying Beta of United States Companies
-
Terrorism and the Resilience of Cities
By James Harrigan and Philippe Martin