Faulty Vessels: In Search of the Justifications for Compelled Medical Care of Pregnant Women

23 Pages Posted: 22 Sep 2011 Last revised: 15 Feb 2022

See all articles by Carolyn McConnell

Carolyn McConnell

University of Washington School of Law

Date Written: December 20, 2010

Abstract

With the capacity of doctors to intervene in pregnancy increasing, the likelihood for conflicts between doctors and hospitals and pregnant women is also increasing. Yet our jurisprudence has failed to clarify the bounds of pregnant women’s autonomy. Indeed, this jurisprudence is marked by confusion, leaving courts in the dark as to how to resolve these conflicts.

Therefore, it is useful to carefully enunciate the rights and interests at issue in forced medical care of pregnant women. This includes 1) the distinction between the right to refuse medical care of oneself and the lack of a right to refuse consent to necessary medical care of others, 2) the right not to be forced to rescue others, and 3) the nature of the exceptions to these rights. Careful delineation of these concepts reveals that forced medical care of pregnant women lacks justification when these principles are consistently applied.

Keywords: pregnancy, medical care, reproductive rights

Suggested Citation

McConnell, Carolyn Anne, Faulty Vessels: In Search of the Justifications for Compelled Medical Care of Pregnant Women (December 20, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1931135 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1931135

Carolyn Anne McConnell (Contact Author)

University of Washington School of Law ( email )

William H. Gates Hall
Box 353020
Seattle, WA 98105-3020
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
41
Abstract Views
702
PlumX Metrics