Preserving Attorney-Client Confidentiality at the Cost of Another's Innocence: A Systemic Approach

Texas Wesleyan Law Review Symposium, Vol. 17, p. 499, 2011

66 Pages Posted: 8 Oct 2011 Last revised: 10 Oct 2011

See all articles by Ken Strutin

Ken Strutin

Government of the State of New York - New York State Defenders Association (NYSDA)

Date Written: August 2, 2011

Abstract

When a client admits to her lawyer that she is responsible for a crime that someone else has been charged with, it alters the geometry of the attorney-client relationship. A third party has now entered the room triangulating the lawyer's responsibilities to her client, to the innocent party and to the justice system. The idea of revealing a client's private confession is anathema to lawyers trained to carefully guard their clients' secrets. Fidelity to the client, preservation of confidences, and the right to counsel strongly militate in favor of nondisclosure. On the other hand, an innocent person is facing a wrongful prosecution, incarceration and, in some cases, execution. The pressures to protect the confessing client while at the same time preventing harm to a non-client from a wrongful conviction are at the heart of a complex ethical and practical conundrum.

The ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct allow discretionary disclosure where the lawyer believes that a third party faces "reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm." And two states have gone so far as to expressly include "wrongful incarceration" in their exceptions to confidentiality. This Article will look at the ethical pathways and the multilayered constitutional and evidentiary analyses in assessing the propriety, necessity and method of disclosure. Other options will be considered that might avoid forcing an attorney to choose between client loyalty and confidentiality or preserving an innocent non-client from substantial harm, such as transactional immunity for the confessor. Lastly, a review of the implications for the adjudication of innocence claims and systemic reform will be conducted, along with an examination of the constitutional imperatives surrounding the attorney-client and attorney-justice relationships.

Suggested Citation

Strutin, Ken, Preserving Attorney-Client Confidentiality at the Cost of Another's Innocence: A Systemic Approach (August 2, 2011). Texas Wesleyan Law Review Symposium, Vol. 17, p. 499, 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1939980

Ken Strutin (Contact Author)

Government of the State of New York - New York State Defenders Association (NYSDA) ( email )

194 Washington Avenue
Albany, NY 12210
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.nysda.org

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
122
Abstract Views
669
Rank
414,524
PlumX Metrics