A Dirty Word or a Dirty World? Attribute Framing, Political Affiliation, and Query Theory

Psychological Science, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 86-92, 2010

7 Pages Posted: 16 Nov 2011

See all articles by David J. Hardisty

David J. Hardisty

Sauder School of Business

Eric N. Johnson

Independent

Elke U. Weber

Princeton University - Department of Psychology

Multiple version iconThere are 3 versions of this paper

Date Written: 2010

Abstract

We explored the effect of attribute framing on choice, labeling charges for environmental costs as either an earmarked tax or an offset. Eight hundred ninety-eight Americans chose between otherwise identical products or services, where one option included a surcharge for emitted carbon dioxide. The cost framing changed preferences for self-identified Republicans and Independents, but did not affect Democrats' preferences. We explain this interaction by means of query theory and show that attribute framing can change the order in which internal queries supporting one or another option are posed. The effect of attribute labeling on query order is shown to depend on the representations of either taxes or offsets held by people with different political affiliations.

Suggested Citation

Hardisty, David J. and Johnson, Eric N. and Weber, Elke U., A Dirty Word or a Dirty World? Attribute Framing, Political Affiliation, and Query Theory (2010). Psychological Science, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 86-92, 2010 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1959736

David J. Hardisty

Sauder School of Business ( email )

Canada
604-827-3158 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.sauder.ubc.ca/Faculty/People/Faculty_Members/Hardisty_David

Eric N. Johnson

Independent

Elke U. Weber (Contact Author)

Princeton University - Department of Psychology

Green Hall
Princeton, NJ 08540
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
79
Abstract Views
785
Rank
194,644
PlumX Metrics