The Case for ‘Beneficial Constraints’: Why Permissive Voluntarism Impedes Workplace Cooperation in Ireland

Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 497-519, 2010

24 Pages Posted: 16 Jan 2012

Date Written: December 9, 2010

Abstract

Drawing on existing literature and two case studies of workplace cooperation in Ireland, this article illustrates that although Ireland has had national-level consensus bargaining since 1987, workplace-level cooperation is rare. This can be largely attributed to Ireland’s permissive voluntarist institutional and employment relations context, characterized by limited institutional coordination linking national and workplace governance, and which renders workplaces particularly exposed to the contradictions of capitalism. The result is that few employers construct and maintain workplace bargains with their employees. Focusing on the concept of ‘beneficial constraints’ on employer choice, it is concluded that if efficient and fair workplace coalitions are to increase, the state would need to reform the permissive voluntarism dominating Irish employment relations by ‘re institutionalizing’ workplace pluralism through proactive policy interventions.

Keywords: economic change, employee participation, industrial democracy, institutions, labor-management cooperation

JEL Classification: J53

Suggested Citation

Dobbins, Tony, The Case for ‘Beneficial Constraints’: Why Permissive Voluntarism Impedes Workplace Cooperation in Ireland (December 9, 2010). Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 497-519, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1986106

Tony Dobbins (Contact Author)

Bangor Business School ( email )

Bangor Business School
College Road
Gwynedd LL57 2DG, Wales LL57 2DG
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
41
Abstract Views
745
PlumX Metrics