From Claytablets to Ajax: Replicating Writing and Documents in Internet Transactions

Journal of Internet Law, Vol. 15, No. 8, 2012

12 Pages Posted: 7 May 2012

See all articles by Eliza Mik

Eliza Mik

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) - Faculty of Law; TILT; Melbourne Law School

Date Written: February 1, 2012

Abstract

Both 'writing' and 'documents' are concepts that rely on tangible carriers, such as paper. Accordingly, legal principles involving either concept presume not only a certain durability, but also the stability and confinement of the information conveyed. What happens when writing is no longer contained on paper? Can writing exist with- out documents? Is it correct to speak of a 'document' if its contents are transient and its scope is difficult to determine? At the current stage of development, legal analysis is incapable of answering any of these questions. Apart from exposing the inadequacy of popular attempts at replicating writing and documents in Internet transactions, this article provides new points of departure for future legal analysis and regulatory efforts in the area of e-commerce. Despite the intuitive association of the terms 'writing' and 'document' with formalities, this article *5 has broader implications. Statute of fraud requirements aside, writing and documents serve as tools of conveying contractual intentions. At the most basic level, a contract must be certain and complete to be enforceable; the contents of the statements made by the transacting parties must be identifiable. The fulfillment of formal requirements seems to be of little value if it is unclear what obligations can actually be enforced. The mainstream approaches to the concepts of 'writing' and 'document' are best tested when confronted with Asynchronous JavaScript and XML (AJAX), a suite of technologies enabling Web pages to partially refresh the displayed content in real time. Admittedly, tying a legal argument to a specific technology may affect its general relevance and condemn it to oblivion once the technology in question declines in popularity. It must, however, be emphasized that AJAX symbolizes an irreversible shift in Web development. Even if the technologies represented by the acronym lose their significance or become obsolete, the World Wide Web will have permanently shifted to more interactive and dynamic interfaces. Accordingly, problems of reconceptualizing traditional legal concepts in light of such developments will persist.

Keywords: AJAX, electronic contracting, formal requirements

Suggested Citation

Mik, Eliza, From Claytablets to Ajax: Replicating Writing and Documents in Internet Transactions (February 1, 2012). Journal of Internet Law, Vol. 15, No. 8, 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2052799

Eliza Mik (Contact Author)

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) - Faculty of Law ( email )

6/F, Lee Shau Kee Building
Shatin, New Territories
Kowloon, Sha Tin
Hong Kong

TILT ( email )

P.O.Box 90153
Prof. Cobbenhagenlaan 221
Tilburg, 5037
Netherlands

Melbourne Law School ( email )

185 Pelham Street
Melbourne, VIC 3010
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
81
Abstract Views
414
Rank
547,434
PlumX Metrics