Bilingual Topographical Signs of Different Sizes are Unconstitutional

The Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law, 2011 (1), pp. 89-93

5 Pages Posted: 20 May 2012

See all articles by Jernej Letnar Cernic

Jernej Letnar Cernic

Faculty of Government and European Studies, New University

Date Written: 2011

Abstract

On 24 June 2010, the Austrian Constitutional Court rendered its most recent decision in a series on bilingual topographical signs in the Austrian province of Carinthia in V 9/10-9. The Court held that the difference in size between the German and Slovenian topographical signs for Bleiburg-Pliburg, Drveša vas- Ebersdorf and Žvabek were illegal and unconstitutional. Recall that the Austrian Constitutional Court had already held, on 13 December 2006, that the difference in size between bilingual topographical signs in German and in Slovenian in those places was illegal and unconstitutional and that this had to be resolved. However, this decision was put aside and bilingual topographical signs of different sizes remained in place.

Keywords: minority rights, topographical signs, Slovenian minority in Austria, Austrian State Treaty

JEL Classification: K00, K33

Suggested Citation

Letnar Cernic, Jernej, Bilingual Topographical Signs of Different Sizes are Unconstitutional (2011). The Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law, 2011 (1), pp. 89-93, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2062935

Jernej Letnar Cernic (Contact Author)

Faculty of Government and European Studies, New University ( email )

Zanova ulica 3
Kranj, 4000
Slovenia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
35
Abstract Views
350
PlumX Metrics