The Quality of Managers in Centralized versus Decentralized Organizations
Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 106, No. 1, 1991
Yale University Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper No. 624
10 Pages Posted: 27 Jun 2012
Date Written: April 1990
Abstract
This paper examines the dynamic consequences of a greater centralization or decentralization of the decision-making authority to appoint successor managers on the quality of managers actually appointed. Our main result is that a greater centralization results in a greater variability over time in the quality of managers. An intuitive reason for this is that though a highly capable manager may have large beneficial effects on the managerial choices within a centralized system, because this manager has greater authority in such a system, a highly incapable manager placed in the same position has correspondingly large deleterious effects.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems
-
Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature
-
Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature
-
Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature
-
CEO Involvement in the Selection of New Board Members: An Empirical Analysis
By David Yermack and Anil Shivdasani
-
The Uncertain Relationship between Board Composition and Firm Performance
By Sanjai Bhagat and Bernard S. Black
-
The Non-Correlation between Board Independence and Long-Term Firm Performance
By Sanjai Bhagat and Bernard S. Black
-
The Non-Correlation between Board Independence And Long-Term Firm Performance
By Sanjai Bhagat and Bernard S. Black