The Cost of Time: Haphazard Discounting and the Undervaluation of Regulatory Benefits

38 Pages Posted: 4 Feb 2011 Last revised: 18 Oct 2012

See all articles by Arden Rowell

Arden Rowell

University of Illinois College of Law

Date Written: January 1, 2010

Abstract

When performing cost-benefit analyses, regulators typically use willingness-to-pay studies to determine how much to spend to avert risks. Because money has a time-value, when a risk is valued is inextricable from how much it is valued. Unfortunately, the studies on which regulators rely are insensitive to this fact: they elicit people’s willingness to pay for risk reductions without identifying the time at which the risk reduction will occur. Relying on these time-indeterminate studies has led to a systematic skew in regulatory cost-benefit analysis, towards the undervaluation of risk. Insofar as cost-benefit analyses inform regulation, this suggests that the current system systematically under-regulates against risks to health and safety.

Keywords: Discounting, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Risk Regulation, VSL, Valuation of Lives, Intertemporal, Willingness-to-Pay

Suggested Citation

Rowell, Arden, The Cost of Time: Haphazard Discounting and the Undervaluation of Regulatory Benefits (January 1, 2010). Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 85, No. 4, 2010, Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 10-30, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1754515

Arden Rowell (Contact Author)

University of Illinois College of Law ( email )

504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
163
Abstract Views
1,045
Rank
329,180
PlumX Metrics