Can Smart Defense Work? A Suggested Approach to Increasing Risk- and Burden-Sharing within NATO

25 Pages Posted: 8 Aug 2012

See all articles by Anke Richter

Anke Richter

Defense Resources Management Institute

Natalie J. Webb

Defense Resources Management Institute

Date Written: July 10, 2012

Abstract

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen proposes “Smart Defense,” as NATO’s new approach to risk- and burden-sharing that “ensur[es] greater security, for less money, by working together with more flexibility.” As part of this approach, he promotes the pooling and sharing of defense capabilities based on the “right” priorities and better coordination of efforts. In effect, Smart Defense seeks to address the issue of burden sharing in a climate of economic downturn by encouraging closer alignment and even interdependencies of defense spending and acquisitions among member nations. This is another attempt to address a chronic problem. The issues surrounding alignment among member nations’ forces, the interoperability of NATO forces, and the notion of burden sharing have been present in the alliance since its inception, and scholarly articles are available dating back to the 1950s:

In this paper, we offer a possible strategy for making at least some of NATO’s Smart Defense initiative more likely to succeed. Similar initiatives were tried as early as 1952 – “In 1952, NATO leaders meeting in Lisbon agreed that the alliance needed military capabilities equal to those of the Soviet bloc and that national contributions should be based on a specialization of effort.”

Despite these agreements, initiatives resulting in more equitable burden sharing have never been fully implemented, and the debate on burden sharing continues. It is important to recall the seminal study on the economics of alliances from 1966, and to realize that its insights have held for nearly 50 years and, in all probability, will hold in the future. In regards to why some nations do not contribute their “fair share,” Olson and Zeckhauser found that smaller alliance members receive even smaller shares of total benefits from accruing collective defense, giving their leaders little or no incentive to provide more defense because they know that larger members will provide the amounts they want for themselves (p. 278). We believe that NATO leaders will be much more likely to succeed in collaborative efforts in situations where a country can reap at least some private (or national) net benefits of providing all or part of a capability. If NATO leaders adopt policies that focus on goods and services such as medical treatment capabilities, where marginal benefits can exceed marginal costs for individual nations, and where the perceived risks of further integration of military capabilities can be adequately addressed, they can increase pooling and sharing. To the extent that pooling and sharing results in improved efficiencies in resource use, member nations have more resources that could be used to provide greater security for all alliance members.

Keywords: NATO, alliances, risk-sharing, burden-sharing

JEL Classification: D74, D79, C69

Suggested Citation

Richter, Anke and Webb, Natalie J., Can Smart Defense Work? A Suggested Approach to Increasing Risk- and Burden-Sharing within NATO (July 10, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2126205 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2126205

Anke Richter

Defense Resources Management Institute ( email )

United States
831-656-2468 (Phone)
831-656-2139 (Fax)

Natalie J. Webb (Contact Author)

Defense Resources Management Institute ( email )

699 Dyer Rd M6
Naval Postgraduate School
Monterey, CA 93943-5001
United States
831-656-2013 (Phone)
831-656-2139 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://faculty.nps.edu/njwebb/

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
136
Abstract Views
1,424
Rank
381,245
PlumX Metrics