The Problem of Suggestion in Psychoanalysis: An Analysis and Solution

Philosophical Psychology 26 (Sept 2013), 718-743. DOI:10.1080/09515089.2012.725533

35 Pages Posted: 4 Sep 2012 Last revised: 24 Jan 2014

See all articles by Michael Lacewing

Michael Lacewing

University College London - Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology

Date Written: September 3, 2012

Abstract

From its inception, psychoanalysis has been troubled by the problem of suggestion. I defend an answer to the problem of suggestion understood as a methodological concern about the evidential basis of psychoanalytic theory. This purely methodological approach is relatively uncommon in discussions in psychoanalysis. I argue that suggestion in psychoanalysis is best understood in terms of experimenter expectancy effects. Such effects are not specific to psychoanalysis, and they can be corrected for by relying on the corroboration of findings by different researchers. This response to the problem of suggestion faces several challenges, and a reply to these is offered. I argue that the psychodynamic model of mind, if not the metapsychological and etiological claims of psychoanalysis, can be vindicated in light of the actual agreement that exists.

Keywords: Psychoanalysis, suggestion, experimenter effects, confirmation bias, methodology, clinical data

Suggested Citation

Lacewing, Michael, The Problem of Suggestion in Psychoanalysis: An Analysis and Solution (September 3, 2012). Philosophical Psychology 26 (Sept 2013), 718-743. DOI:10.1080/09515089.2012.725533 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2140857

Michael Lacewing (Contact Author)

University College London - Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology ( email )

London
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
74
Abstract Views
897
Rank
576,227
PlumX Metrics