Testing an Informational Theory of Legislation: Evidence from the U.S. House of Representatives
32 Pages Posted: 24 Jan 2012 Last revised: 12 Oct 2012
Date Written: October 9, 2012
Abstract
Using data on roll calls from the U.S. House of Representatives, this paper finds empirical support for informational theories of legislative decision-making. Consistent with the theoretical prediction, the bias of the committee a bill gets assigned to is strongly positively associated with the bias of its sponsor, and unbiased sponsors in expectation get assigned to roughly unbiased committees. Moreover, we find a negative relationship between the sponsor's absolute bias and the probability that the legislation is processed by closed rule. Despite these empirical regularities, there is a large variation in the data, suggesting that considerations other than informational efficiency are also important in committee appointments and procedural rule selection. As far as we know, our paper is the first one that provides quantitative empirical support for a theory of cheap talk versus delegation, in any setting.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Oliver Hart and Bengt R. Holmström
-
By Oliver Hart and Bengt R. Holmström
-
Incentives, Information, and Organizational Form
By Yingyi Qian, Eric Maskin, ...
-
On the Design of Hierarchies: Coordination Versus Specialization
By Oliver Hart and John Moore
-
On the Design of Hierarchies: Coordination Versus Specialization
By Oliver Hart and John Moore
-
On the Design of Hierarchies: Coordination Versus Specialization
By Oliver Hart and John Moore
-
When Does Coordination Require Centralization
By Ricardo Alonso, Wouter Dessein, ...
-
When Does Coordination Require Centralization?
By Ricardo Alonso, Wouter Dessein, ...
-
Reallocation of Corporate Resources and Managerial Incentives in Internal Capital Markets
By Sandro Brusco and Fausto Panunzi
-
Reallocation of Corporate Resources and Managerial Incentives in Internal Capital Markets
By Sandro Brusco and Fausto Panunzi