Taking Self-Governance Seriously: Synthetic Biology’s Last, Best Chance to Improve Security

University of Califronia, Berkeley Goldman School of Public Policy Working Paper No. GSPP12-003

16 Pages Posted: 1 Dec 2012

See all articles by Stephen M. Maurer

Stephen M. Maurer

University of California, Berkeley

Date Written: November 30, 2012

Abstract

Synthetic biologists have vigorously debated the need for community-wide biosecurity standards for the past decade. Despite this, the US government’s official response has been limited to weak and entirely voluntary Guidelines. This article describes attempts by journal editors, academic scientists, and commercial firms to organize private alternatives at the grassroots level. Private commercial standards, in particular, are significantly stronger than federal Guidelines and currently operate across more than eighty percent of the synthetic DNA industry. The paper generalizes from these examples by asking when strong private standards are both feasible and likely to produce outcomes that are comparably democratic to conventional agency regulation. It closes by describing interventions that government can use to promote and manage grassroots standards initiatives.

Keywords: Biosecurity, dual use products, self-governance, self-regulation, synthetic biology, synthetic DNA

JEL Classification: K29, F52

Suggested Citation

Maurer, Stephen M., Taking Self-Governance Seriously: Synthetic Biology’s Last, Best Chance to Improve Security (November 30, 2012). University of Califronia, Berkeley Goldman School of Public Policy Working Paper No. GSPP12-003, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2183306 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2183306

Stephen M. Maurer (Contact Author)

University of California, Berkeley ( email )

Berkeley, CA 94720
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
98
Abstract Views
1,310
Rank
486,005
PlumX Metrics