Misperceptions in Intergroup Conflict: Disagreeing about What We Disagree about

Psychological Science, 17, 38-45, 2006

8 Pages Posted: 15 Dec 2012

See all articles by John R. Chambers

John R. Chambers

St. Louis University

Robert S. Baron

University of Iowa

Mary Inman

Hope College

Date Written: December 1, 2005

Abstract

Two studies examined misperceptions of disagreement in partisan social conflicts, namely, in the debates over abortion (Study 1) and politics (Study 2). We observed that partisans tend to exaggerate differences of opinion with their adversaries. Further, we found that perceptions of disagreement were more pronounced for values that were central to the perceiver’s own ideology than for values that were central to the ideology of the perceiver’s adversaries.To the extent that partisans assumed disagreement concerning personally important values, they were also inaccurate in perceiving their adversaries’ actual opinions. Discussion focuses on the cognitive mechanisms underlying misperceptions of disagreement and strategies for reducing intergroup conflict.

Keywords: conflict, politics, egocentrism, Fixed Pie Perceptions

Suggested Citation

Chambers, John R. and Baron, Robert S. and Inman, Mary, Misperceptions in Intergroup Conflict: Disagreeing about What We Disagree about (December 1, 2005). Psychological Science, 17, 38-45, 2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2189424

John R. Chambers (Contact Author)

St. Louis University ( email )

3511 LaClede Avenue
St. Louis, MO 63103
United States

Robert S. Baron

University of Iowa ( email )

341 Schaeffer Hall
Iowa City, IA 52242-1097
United States

Mary Inman

Hope College

United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
63
Abstract Views
814
Rank
632,749
PlumX Metrics