The Effect of Leverage on the Tax-Cut Versus Investment-Subsidy Argument

23 Pages Posted: 27 Feb 2013

See all articles by Anna N. Danielova

Anna N. Danielova

McMaster University - Finance & Business Economics

Sudipto Sarkar

McMaster University - Finance & Business Economics

Date Written: September 9, 2011

Abstract

Two common methods of attracting corporate investment are investment incentives and tax incentives. It is important to use the two incentives in the correct proportions, otherwise the government will give up too much value in the process of attracting investment. This paper examines the effect of tax cut and investment subsidy on the government’s net benefit from a project. Earlier studies concluded that it was optimal to use only investment subsidy and no tax cuts. We show that this is not true when debt financing is possible, and it is generally optimal (from the government’s perspective) to use a combination of tax reduction and investment subsidy. The optimal tax rate and optimal investment subsidy are identified and analyzed in the paper. It is shown that using a sub-optimal combination of incentives can result in substantial reduction of benefits for the government.

Keywords: investment incentive, tax reduction, investment subsidy, real option

Suggested Citation

Danielova, Anna N. and Sarkar, Sudipto, The Effect of Leverage on the Tax-Cut Versus Investment-Subsidy Argument (September 9, 2011). Review of Financial Economics, Vol. 20, 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2225375

Anna N. Danielova

McMaster University - Finance & Business Economics ( email )

School of Business
1280 Main St. W.
Hamilton, ON L8S 4M4
Canada

Sudipto Sarkar (Contact Author)

McMaster University - Finance & Business Economics ( email )

School of Business
1280 Main St. W.
Hamilton, ON L8S 4M4
Canada
905-525-9140 (Phone)
905-521-8995 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
74
Abstract Views
681
Rank
580,905
PlumX Metrics