Habermas y Foucault: ¿pensadores de la sociedad civil? (Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for Civil Society?)

Estudios Sociológicos, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 295-324, 2001. Spanish translation by Lorena Murillo.

31 Pages Posted: 18 Jun 2013

See all articles by Bent Flyvbjerg

Bent Flyvbjerg

University of Oxford - Said Business School; IT University of Copenhagen; St Anne's College, University of Oxford

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: May 1, 2001

Abstract

Una sociedad civil fuerte, es la condición esencial para que una democracia sea sustentable. La preocupación del proyecto democrático es dar poder a la sociedad civil, y para la teoría política y social lo importante es la forma como se determina la manera ideal de concebir este otorgamiento de poder. Pero, ¿qué es la sociedad civil? Querer hallar definiciones claras en la literature acerca de la materia es inútil, no porque el concepto carezca de definiciones, sino porque son demasiadas en número y variedad como para que aporten claridad. No obstante, la mayoría de los que han escrito acerca de la sociedad civil piensan que ésta posee un núcleo institucional, constituido por asociaciones de voluntarios, ajenas al ámbito del Estado y la economía, las cuales abarcan desde iglesias, asociaciones culturales, clubes deportivos y sociedades de debates, además de medios de comunicación independientes, academias, grupos de ciudadanos, iniciativas populares y organizaciones de género, raza y sexualidad, hasta las asociaciones profesionales, partidos politicos y sindicatos.

Vaclav Havel observed that a strong civil society is a crucial condition of strong democracy. Empowering civil society is a central concern for the project of democracy, just as the question of how best to think about such empowerment is important to social and political theory. But what is ‘civil society’? A search for clear definitions in the relevant literature is in vain. Not because the concept lacks definitions; rather the definitions are too multiple and varied to bring clarity. Most writers on civil society agree, however, that civil society has an institutional core constituted by voluntary associations outside the sphere of the state and the economy. Such associations range from, for example, churches, cultural associations, sport clubs and debating societies to independent media, academies, groups of concerned citizens, grass-roots initiatives and organizations of gender, race and sexuality, all the way to occupational associations, political parties and labour unions (Habermas 1992a: 453).

Note: Downloadable document is in Spanish.

Suggested Citation

Flyvbjerg, Bent, Habermas y Foucault: ¿pensadores de la sociedad civil? (Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for Civil Society?) (May 1, 2001). Estudios Sociológicos, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 295-324, 2001. Spanish translation by Lorena Murillo., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2278391

Bent Flyvbjerg (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Said Business School ( email )

Oxford
Great Britain

IT University of Copenhagen ( email )

Copenhagen
Denmark

St Anne's College, University of Oxford ( email )

Oxford
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
60
Abstract Views
1,313
Rank
131,081
PlumX Metrics