Under Color of Law: Siliadin v France and the Dynamics of Enslavement in Historical Perspective

The Legal Understanding of Slavery: From the Historical to the Contemporary. Allain, J., Ed. Oxford University Press, 2012

U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 334

16 Pages Posted: 12 Jul 2013

See all articles by Rebecca J. Scott

Rebecca J. Scott

University of Michigan Law School

Date Written: September 2012

Abstract

A versão em português deste artigo pode ser encontrada em: ssrn.com/abstract=2292162.

When is it appropriate to apply the term "slavery" -- a concept that appears to rest on a property right -- to patterns of exploitation in contemporary society, when no state extends formal recognition to the possibility of the ownership of property in a human being? Historians, who generally position themselves as enemies of anachronism, may be particularly resistant to the use of an ancient term to describe a twenty-first century reality. And jurists have often been understandably reluctant to employ a word whose historical meaning was so closely tied to a specific property relationship that has long since been abolished in Europe and the Americas.

Keywords: contemporary slavery, powers attaching to the right of ownership, France, Saint-Domingue, European Court of Human Rights, Siliadin v. France

JEL Classification: D63, N10

Suggested Citation

Scott, Rebecca J., Under Color of Law: Siliadin v France and the Dynamics of Enslavement in Historical Perspective (September 2012). The Legal Understanding of Slavery: From the Historical to the Contemporary. Allain, J., Ed. Oxford University Press, 2012, U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 334, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2292681

Rebecca J. Scott (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
195
Abstract Views
1,307
Rank
283,274
PlumX Metrics