Regulation Through Substitution as Policy Tool: Swap Futurization Under Dodd-Frank

59 Pages Posted: 25 Apr 2013 Last revised: 19 Apr 2015

See all articles by Gabriel D. Rosenberg

Gabriel D. Rosenberg

Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP

Jai R. Massari

UC Berkeley School of Law

Date Written: August 21, 2013

Abstract

Recently, significant market and regulatory attention has focused on a new trend known as “futurization” — the recasting of economic arrangements previously transacted as swaps to trade as futures. This trend results from new regulations governing swap markets under the Dodd-Frank Act, which increase the cost of transacting in swaps. Given the magnitude of the business and economic interests at stake — the swaps market is estimated at $633 trillion and the futures market is estimated to be $24 trillion — the futurization trend has significant implications for the success of the Dodd-Frank Act’s swap market reforms and can provide important insights to regulatory agencies as they seek to protect financial markets in the post-financial crisis environment.

This Article is the first to provide an academic treatment of this trend and its implications for regulatory policymaking. We develop a simple economic model to explain how regulators can “regulate through substitution” by encouraging market participants to subject themselves to one regulatory regime versus another through the imposition of differential regulatory costs. By applying this model to three critical areas of CFTC swap rulemaking — margin requirements, protection of customer collateral and public dissemination of swap trading data — we predict the futurization effects of these regulations, which are in some cases contrary to what might be expected or desired. In doing so, we demonstrate how the common view of futurization as a trend affecting the swap markets in a uniform manner is overly simplistic and obscures the important lessons of futurization.

Armed with this predictive tool, we believe that the CFTC can apply the regulation through substitution analysis to design regulations better to achieve its policy goals and to assess the costs and benefits of proposed regulations. This same tool can be used by other regulators that similarly oversee multiple related regulatory regimes to better implement their policy concerns in similar contexts.

Keywords: futurization, Dodd-Frank, swaps, cost-benefit, regulatory arbitrage

JEL Classification: K20, K22, K23

Suggested Citation

Rosenberg, Gabriel D. and Massari, Jai Ruhi, Regulation Through Substitution as Policy Tool: Swap Futurization Under Dodd-Frank (August 21, 2013). Columbia Business Law Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2256047 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2256047

Gabriel D. Rosenberg (Contact Author)

Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP ( email )

450 Lexington Ave.
New York, NY 10017
United States

Jai Ruhi Massari

UC Berkeley School of Law ( email )

302 JSP
2240 Piedmont Ave
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
808
Abstract Views
3,622
Rank
56,868
PlumX Metrics