Publication Bias in the Returns to R&D Literature
29 Pages Posted: 22 Nov 2013
Date Written: November 21, 2013
Abstract
The returns to R&D literature is large and has been surveyed on several occasions. We complement previous surveys by using formal meta analytic techniques to analyse publication bias. We find evidence consistent with a strong positive bias in the part of the literature that controls for unobserved firm fixed effects. The reason may be that fixed effects specifications are particularly susceptible to measurement errors and therefore have a high probability of producing implausibly low return estimates. Implausible estimates are likely to be filtered out before being reported, and our analysis suggest that 26% of a hypothetical complete literature is missing. Future reviews should take into account that the full effect of negative specifications biases may be masked by reporting and publication bias.
Keywords: Returns to R&D, Meta-analysis, Publication bias, Funnel asymmetry, Trim-and-fill method, FAT-PET
JEL Classification: C83, D24, O31
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Bronwyn H. Hall, Jacques Mairesse, ...
-
By Bronwyn H. Hall, Jacques Mairesse, ...
-
One or Many Knowledge Production Functions? Mapping Innovative Activity Using Microdata
By Andrea Conte and Marco Vivarelli
-
By M. Ishaq Nadiri and Ingmar R. Prucha
-
Corporate Taxation and the Choice of Patent Location within Multinational Firms
By Tom Karkinsky and Nadine Riedel
-
On the Relationship between R&D and Productivity: A Treatment Effect Analysis
By Giuseppe Medda, Claudio A. Piga, ...