Binary Relations from Tournament Solutions, and Back Again

21 Pages Posted: 8 May 2013 Last revised: 17 Apr 2014

See all articles by Scott Moser

Scott Moser

University of Nottingham - School of Politics and International Relations

Daniel Allcock

University of Texas at Austin

Date Written: April 11, 2014

Abstract

We present a generalization of an abstract model of group choice in which the process of collective choice is modeled as a cooperative process of consideration and reconsideration of alternatives. We develop a general framework for studying choice from a finite set of alternatives, using the idea that one alternative may challenge – or displace from consideration – another in the course of a group choosing. From this binary relation – the “challenges” relation – new tournament solutions are obtained, the limit of which is the central object of the present study. The model presented generalizes that of contestation [Schwartz, 1990] and we characterize the set of alter- natives that can be chosen in a collective choice setting when the process of collective choice is viewed as cooperatively considering and reconsidering alternatives. Basic properties of the family of tournament solutions studied are given as well.

Keywords: collective choice, tournament solution, contestation, Tournament Equilibrium Set

Suggested Citation

Moser, Scott and Allcock, Daniel, Binary Relations from Tournament Solutions, and Back Again (April 11, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2261959 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2261959

Scott Moser (Contact Author)

University of Nottingham - School of Politics and International Relations ( email )

Nottingham
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~ldzsm2/

Daniel Allcock

University of Texas at Austin ( email )

2317 Speedway
Austin, TX Texas 78712
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
47
Abstract Views
551
PlumX Metrics