Law and Interdisciplinarity: On the Inevitable Normativity of Legal Studies

Critical Analysis of Law 1:1 (2014), 75-86

Maastricht European Private Law Institute Working Paper 2014/10

15 Pages Posted: 19 Mar 2014 Last revised: 10 May 2014

See all articles by Jan M. Smits

Jan M. Smits

Maastricht University Faculty of Law

Date Written: March 17, 2014

Abstract

The field of legal studies is undergoing rapid changes of a highly diverse nature. Increasing specialization, globalization, the rise of interdisciplinary legal studies, and a growing separation of legal research and teaching prompt the question: What is the aim and method of legal studies? The approach advocated in this article provides a contextual model of legal scholarship. Its most important feature is that the basis for autonomous legal studies lies in the fact that it offers a method of analysis. Legal studies look at the world through the lens of what people ought to do in law. This puts “Law and …” approaches in context: it is impossible to carry out meaningful interdisciplinary work in the law without giving center stage to the question of what the law ought to be. This article explores the consequences of this “inevitable normativity” of legal studies for future academic research and teaching.

Keywords: Critical legal thinking, contextually, legal studies

Suggested Citation

Smits, Jan M., Law and Interdisciplinarity: On the Inevitable Normativity of Legal Studies (March 17, 2014). Critical Analysis of Law 1:1 (2014), 75-86, Maastricht European Private Law Institute Working Paper 2014/10, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2410518

Jan M. Smits (Contact Author)

Maastricht University Faculty of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 616
Maastricht, NL-6200 MD
Netherlands

HOME PAGE: http://www.jansmits.eu

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
255
Abstract Views
1,095
Rank
217,190
PlumX Metrics