Best Interests Equals Zealous Advocacy: A Not So Radical View of Holistic Representation for Children Accused of Crime
73 Pages Posted: 25 May 2014 Last revised: 26 May 2014
Date Written: 2003
Abstract
In this article, I explain the importance of high quality, zealous advocacy for children accused of crime in juvenile court, and what it takes to provide such professional services. In Part I, I explore the right to counsel granted by the Gault Court, in Part II, I analyze the different views of counsel's functions in juvenile court, and Part III develops my model of holistic lawyering and how it plays out in the ideal and real world.
Keywords: juvenile justice, right to counsel, Gault, holistic lawyering
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Marrus, Ellen, Best Interests Equals Zealous Advocacy: A Not So Radical View of Holistic Representation for Children Accused of Crime (2003). Maryland Law Review, Vol. 62, No. 2, 2003, U of Houston Law Center No. 2014-A12, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2441233
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.