Making Up the Judge's Mind – A Psychoanalytic Perspective on Legal Reasoning and the Role of the Judge

17 Pages Posted: 6 Jun 2014

See all articles by Richard M Cornes

Richard M Cornes

University of Essex - School of Law

Date Written: June 5, 2014

Abstract

An essay about legal reasoning and the judicial role from the perspective of psychoanalytic theory. Its thesis is that recourse to explanatory concepts outside of the discipline of the law – here, psychoanalytic theory – is necessary in order to understand how judges decide cases, and why we trust them. The argument has four parts. First, I suggest that legal training and practice requires the construction of a distinct psychical apparatus, with the ordinary, personal Über Ich/Ich, joined by a legal Über Ich/Ich. Then I look to the concept of phantasy to explain how, while remaining true to their oath to decide matters only according to the law, a judge’s personal experiences do influence their judgments. The third section describes the roles splitting and repression play in enabling a judge to do her job; that section ends with a note about the limits of the defences. The final substantive part rises above the world of the individual judge to consider the necessity, and implications of, part-object relating in the litigation process.

Keywords: Judges, judiciary, pyschoanalysis, Freud, Klein, splitting, repression, phantasy, democracy, rule of law

Suggested Citation

Cornes, Richard M, Making Up the Judge's Mind – A Psychoanalytic Perspective on Legal Reasoning and the Role of the Judge (June 5, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2446452 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2446452

Richard M Cornes (Contact Author)

University of Essex - School of Law ( email )

Colchester, Essex CO43SQ
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
253
Abstract Views
1,295
Rank
219,894
PlumX Metrics