Centralization versus Decentralization: Risk Pooling, Risk Diversification, and Supply Chain Disruptions
31 Pages Posted: 3 Apr 2008 Last revised: 19 Jun 2014
Date Written: June 17, 2014
Abstract
We investigate optimal system design in a multi-location system in which supply is subject to disruptions. We examine the expected costs and cost variances of the system in both a centralized and a decentralized inventory system. We show that, when demand is deterministic and supply may be disrupted, using a decentralized inventory design reduces cost variance through the risk diversification effect, and therefore a decentralized inventory system is optimal. This is in contrast to the classical result that when supply is deterministic and demand is stochastic, centralization is optimal due to the risk-pooling effect. When both supply may be disrupted and demand is stochastic, we demonstrate that a risk-averse firm should typically choose a decentralized inventory system design.
Keywords: supply disruptions, inventory management, risk diversification
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Inventory Systems with Stochastic Demand and Supply: Properties and Approximations
By Amanda J. Schmitt, Lawrence V. Snyder, ...
-
Infinite-Horizon Models for Inventory Control under Yield Uncertainty and Disruptions
-
A Quantitative Analysis of Disruption Risk in a Multi-Echelon Supply Chain
By Amanda J. Schmitt and Mahender Singh
-
Strategies for Customer Service Level Protection under Multi-Echelon Supply Chain Disruption Risk
-
Disruptions in One-Warehouse Multiple-Retailer Systems
By Zumbul Atan and Lawrence V. Snyder
-
A Single-Period Analysis of a Two-Echelon Inventory System with Dependent Supply Uncertainty
By Susan H. Xu, Behdad Masih-tehrani, ...
-
OR/MS Models for Supply Chain Disruptions: A Review
By Lawrence V. Snyder, Zumbul Atan, ...
-
Sharing Capacity Cost in Shared Services Centre
By Tomas Buus
-
Failure Risk and Quality Cost Management in Single versus Multiple Sourcing Decision
By Andrew Yim