An Express Constitutional Right to Vote? The Case for Reviving Section 41
Sydney Law Review, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 205-230, 2014
University of Queensland TC Beirne School of Law Research Paper No. 14-26
26 Pages Posted: 2 Jul 2014
There are 2 versions of this paper
An Express Constitutional Right to Vote? The Case for Reviving Section 41
Date Written: July 1, 2014
Abstract
Section 41 of the Australian Constitution appears, on its face, to guarantee state electors the right to vote in Commonwealth elections. However, the High Court held in R v Pearson; Ex parte Sipka that the provision was merely transitional and no longer has any effect. This article takes issue with that conclusion. The authors contend that the majority’s reasoning in Pearson is unpersuasive. Further, a revived s 41 would cohere well with some of the central themes in Australia’s recent constitutional evolution, including the High Court’s changing approach to the protection of voting rights and the role of the states in constitutional reform under the Australia Acts 1986. The time is therefore ripe for the High Court to reconsider Pearson and integrate s 41 into its voting rights jurisprudence.
Keywords: Constitutional law, voting rights, federalism, Australia Acts
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation