Choices of Optimal Monetary Policy Instruments Under the Floating and the Basket-Peg Regimes

The Singapore Economic Review, Vol. 57, No. 4, 2012

31 Pages Posted: 26 Jul 2014

See all articles by Naoyuki Yoshino

Naoyuki Yoshino

Asian Development Bank Institute

Sahoko Kaji

Keio University

Tamon Asonuma

International Monetary Fund (IMF) Strategy Policy and Review Department

Date Written: December 21, 2012

Abstract

This paper determines whether adopting the basket-peg rather than the floating regime is optimal for emerging market countries. Under the basket-peg regime, there is a trade-off between practical usefulness and welfare losses associated with capital movements across countries. We develop a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model for small open economies to derive a simple basket weight rule. Although this is suboptimal, we find it practical and easy to implement. With calibration using Singaporean and Thai data for 1997Q3-2006Q2 and comparison among cumulative losses associated with the policy instrument rules, we show that a commitment to the basket weight rule is superior to other instrument rules under the floating regime for small, open emerging market countries like Singapore and Thailand.

Keywords: Basket-peg regime; Monetary Policy Instruments; Small Open Economy; Exchange Rate Regime

JEL Classification: F33; F41

Suggested Citation

Yoshino, Naoyuki and Kaji, Sahoko and Asonuma, Tamon, Choices of Optimal Monetary Policy Instruments Under the Floating and the Basket-Peg Regimes (December 21, 2012). The Singapore Economic Review, Vol. 57, No. 4, 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2471269

Naoyuki Yoshino

Asian Development Bank Institute ( email )

Kasumigaseki Building 8F
3-2-5, Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku
Tokyo, 100-6008
Japan

Sahoko Kaji

Keio University ( email )

2-15-45 Mita
Minato-ku
Tokyo, 108-8345
Japan

Tamon Asonuma (Contact Author)

International Monetary Fund (IMF) Strategy Policy and Review Department ( email )

700 19th Street NW
Washington, DC 20431
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
55
Abstract Views
499
Rank
675,679
PlumX Metrics