What Would Congress Want? If We Want to Know, Why Not Ask?

35 Pages Posted: 6 Mar 2012 Last revised: 10 Apr 2015

See all articles by Danieli Evans

Danieli Evans

Seattle University School of Law

Date Written: March 1, 2012

Abstract

This is the first proposed procedure that would enable the Court to take account of congressional preferences in a pending statutory interpretation decision, without requiring Congress to go through the resource and time consuming process of amending the ambiguous law. In “hard cases” the Court could certify, through a fast-track procedure, a question presenting Congress with two multiple choices that the Court predetermines to be viable readings of the statute. This procedure avoids constitutional problems because congressional input is voluntary and non-binding for both branches, and judicial constraint enforces rule of law and constitutional values.

Keywords: legislation, statutory interpretation, congress, judicial administration

Suggested Citation

Evans, Danieli, What Would Congress Want? If We Want to Know, Why Not Ask? (March 1, 2012). University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 81, 2013, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2016951 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2016951

Danieli Evans (Contact Author)

Seattle University School of Law ( email )

901 12th Avenue, Sullivan Hall
P.O. Box 222000
Seattle, WA n/a 98122-1090
United States
98144 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
76
Abstract Views
1,239
Rank
571,961
PlumX Metrics