Capital Budgeting: A 'General Equilibrium' Analysis

11 Pages Posted: 17 Oct 2014 Last revised: 21 Oct 2014

See all articles by Bradford Cornell

Bradford Cornell

Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: October 18, 2014

Abstract

As presented in leading corporate finance textbooks the predominant method for making capital budgeting decision is discounted cash flow analysis. The primary benefit of this approach is that it allows for different discount rates to be used for different projects. In this paper, I argue that this alleged benefit is, in fact, a detriment for two reasons. First, the betas that determine the differing discount rates are not only measured with significant error, but tend to drift substantially over the life of typical capital budgeting projects. Second, introducing differential discount rates is likely to conflict with other “general equilibrium” management objectives related to developing a successful corporate culture that promotes collaboration and innovation. This explains why many companies, particularly companies that have a large number of growth options, choose alternatives to discounted cash flow such as the internal rate of return.

Keywords: capital budgeting, discount rates

JEL Classification: G31

Suggested Citation

Cornell, Bradford, Capital Budgeting: A 'General Equilibrium' Analysis (October 18, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2510874 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2510874

Bradford Cornell (Contact Author)

Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA ( email )

Pasadena, CA 91125
United States
626 833-9978 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
203
Abstract Views
1,390
Rank
160,139
PlumX Metrics